That same problem exists for bank transfer disputes. If you accept that<br>
risk, you should accept it here too. Thats why we want several arbitrators,<br>
so kidnapping the relevant ones becomes unlikely.<br>
<br>
A seg, 4/06/2018, 16:06, Aleksej Jocic <notifications@github.com> escreveu:<br>
<br>
> If I understand the modified proposal, arbitrator would have access to the<br>
> bank name of the user and the amount he withdrew. If a government agency<br>
> gets this data for a lot of Bisq users, they could also get the data from<br>
> every bank on all of it's users and derive a hash for every bank user<br>
> account. Than just see which ones match and they get the list of only Bisq<br>
> users.<br>
><br>
> Even if banks had billions of users, this would take seconds even on a GPU.<br>
> Not to mention that if they already have amounts that were withdrawn, they<br>
> could filter those out.<br>
> Maybe they even know the probable time frame when this was withdrawn and<br>
> might not even need to hash anything.<br>
><br>
> The problem isn't just the arbitrator himself, even if they are very<br>
> trusted they could be a victim of a lot bigger more serious attack. I just<br>
> see too big of risk for too little of a gain here. Security is very<br>
> important to all exchanges, but Bisq also cares and provides privacy that<br>
> can not be matched by any centralized exchange, that is what makes this<br>
> project so important.<br>
><br>
> —<br>
> You are receiving this because you commented.<br>
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<br>
> <https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394388502>,<br>
> or mute the thread<br>
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFWUaDollBr__nmJYhANgkG1pC2dM2Mks5t5U0JgaJpZM4UXw49><br>
> .<br>
><br>


<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394429106">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtjaXDoT9vk6arNmn1aQdUIhkm3CCks5t5WncgaJpZM4UXw49">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZtt3yTXCI7VcJlGx_YY2nMeZ6LVEjks5t5WncgaJpZM4UXw49.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"EmailMessage","potentialAction":{"@type":"ViewAction","target":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394429106","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394429106","name":"View Issue"},"description":"View this Issue on GitHub","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com"}}</script>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@riclas in #23: That same problem exists for bank transfer disputes. If you accept that\nrisk, you should accept it here too. Thats why we want several arbitrators,\nso kidnapping the relevant ones becomes unlikely.\n\nA seg, 4/06/2018, 16:06, Aleksej Jocic \u003cnotifications@github.com\u003e escreveu:\n\n\u003e If I understand the modified proposal, arbitrator would have access to the\n\u003e bank name of the user and the amount he withdrew. If a government agency\n\u003e gets this data for a lot of Bisq users, they could also get the data from\n\u003e every bank on all of it's users and derive a hash for every bank user\n\u003e account. Than just see which ones match and they get the list of only Bisq\n\u003e users.\n\u003e\n\u003e Even if banks had billions of users, this would take seconds even on a GPU.\n\u003e Not to mention that if they already have amounts that were withdrawn, they\n\u003e could filter those out.\n\u003e Maybe they even know the probable time frame when this was withdrawn and\n\u003e might not even need to hash anything.\n\u003e\n\u003e The problem isn't just the arbitrator himself, even if they are very\n\u003e trusted they could be a victim of a lot bigger more serious attack. I just\n\u003e see too big of risk for too little of a gain here. Security is very\n\u003e important to all exchanges, but Bisq also cares and provides privacy that\n\u003e can not be matched by any centralized exchange, that is what makes this\n\u003e project so important.\n\u003e\n\u003e —\n\u003e You are receiving this because you commented.\n\u003e Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub\n\u003e \u003chttps://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394388502\u003e,\n\u003e or mute the thread\n\u003e \u003chttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFWUaDollBr__nmJYhANgkG1pC2dM2Mks5t5U0JgaJpZM4UXw49\u003e\n\u003e .\n\u003e\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394429106"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "37567f93-e2a7-4e2a-ad37-a9160fc62647",
"title": "Re: [bisq-network/proposals] Certification for ownership of a bank account (#23)",
"sections": [
{
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "**riclas**",
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@riclas",
"facts": [

]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"name": "Add a comment",
"@type": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [
{
"isMultiLine": true,
"@type": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment",
"isRequired": false
}
],
"actions": [
{
"name": "Comment",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 23,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Close issue",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 23\n}"
},
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-394429106"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 341773885\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}</script>