<p><b>@ManfredKarrer</b> commented on this pull request.</p>

<p>I tested it with setting libdohj to the prev. commit version (dbc23c67) in common.<br>
It would be expected that the hash of libdohj and btcj change but they stay the same.</p>
<p>The desktop build would fail as well then due wrong hashes.</p>
<p>Tried different variants also with including the libdohj with version dbc23c67 in desktop but no luck. Any idea? Probably some stupid mistake from my side...</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop/pull/1563#pullrequestreview-126085713">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtocxD5gO2vCP6NpekfqdFYH5Qp1Wks5t5scZgaJpZM4Ua_LQ">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZtoeuO_rgjB4WamGXQ5iwmY69vtApks5t5scZgaJpZM4Ua_LQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"EmailMessage","potentialAction":{"@type":"ViewAction","target":"https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop/pull/1563#pullrequestreview-126085713","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop/pull/1563#pullrequestreview-126085713","name":"View Pull Request"},"description":"View this Pull Request on GitHub","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com"}}</script>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/bisq-desktop","title":"bisq-network/bisq-desktop","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@ManfredKarrer commented on #1563"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop/pull/1563#pullrequestreview-126085713"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "37567f93-e2a7-4e2a-ad37-a9160fc62647",
"title": "@ManfredKarrer commented on 1563",
"sections": [
{
"text": "I tested it with setting libdohj to the prev. commit version (dbc23c67) in common. \r\nIt would be expected that the hash of libdohj and btcj change but they stay the same. \r\n\r\nThe desktop build would fail as well then due wrong hashes. \r\n\r\nTried different variants also with including the libdohj with version dbc23c67 in desktop but no luck. Any idea? Probably some stupid mistake from my side...",
"activityTitle": "**Manfred Karrer**",
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@ManfredKarrer",
"facts": [

]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-desktop/pull/1563#pullrequestreview-126085713"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 342618832\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}</script>