<p>Since I wrote the previous proposal, I thought also on the follow-up, and without speaking with Manfred, I arrived roughly at analog conclusions :</p>
<p>1/ maintain free listing ... but only for the <strong>first</strong> enlisting. (warmup phase)<br>
So it's up to the candidates to <strong>profit</strong> from this opportunity, or to waste it.<br>
And nobody can reproach Bisq not being altcoins friendly.<br>
Bisq is altcoins friendly, but Bisq is a living meeting place, not a dead altcoins memorial.</p>
<p>2/ if the first free enlisting doesn't lead to enough trading (or at least offers) and ends with unlisting, then the next enlisting is <strong>no more free</strong>.<br>
And the payment has to be done in <strong>BSQ</strong> is probably a good solution for multiple reasons: legal, good for the BSQ token itself, good for the project human ressources if earned BSQ, good for involving the serious candidates and having them as contact, etc.</p>
<p>3/ as for the delays, many solutions are possible, 120 days seems ok, but we may also say that the delay is 2 (or 3) releases.<br>
imo, candidates have to fully integrate the marketing/trading strategy <strong>immediately</strong> with the listing efforts. If this is not done as a bundle, I see the probability of succeeding as very low.</p>
<p>4/ I found also that fixing threshold is not so obvious. Maybe that instead of fixing such threshold we can just consider the ranking, and eliminate the worst performers. Or a combination of threshold + ranking ?</p>
<p>Anyway, if the listing policy is changed, we need to <strong>strongly</strong> warn the candidates to not waste their 1st trial.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-427294682">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtkOhLQjLMdcmbgrOgQ-LUGsyRwEuks5uhx9ngaJpZM4XJsfS">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZtjMh1NKKeRH6X54Egu9qksekuZOPks5uhx9ngaJpZM4XJsfS.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@HarryMacfinned in #41: Since I wrote the previous proposal, I thought also on the follow-up, and without speaking with Manfred, I arrived roughly at analog conclusions :\r\n\r\n1/ maintain free listing ... but only for the **first** enlisting. (warmup phase)\r\nSo it's up to the candidates to **profit** from this opportunity, or to waste it.\r\nAnd nobody can reproach Bisq not being altcoins friendly.\r\nBisq is altcoins friendly, but Bisq is a living meeting place, not a dead altcoins memorial.\r\n\r\n2/ if the first free enlisting doesn't lead to enough trading (or at least offers) and ends with unlisting, then the next enlisting is **no more free**.\r\nAnd the payment has to be done in **BSQ** is probably a good solution for multiple reasons: legal, good for the BSQ token itself, good for the project human ressources if earned BSQ, good for involving the serious candidates and having them as contact, etc.\r\n\r\n3/ as for the delays, many solutions are possible, 120 days seems ok, but we may also say that the delay is 2 (or 3) releases.\r\nimo, candidates have to fully integrate the marketing/trading strategy **immediately** with the listing efforts. If this is not done as a bundle, I see the probability of succeeding as very low.\r\n\r\n4/ I found also that fixing threshold is not so obvious. Maybe that instead of fixing such threshold we can just consider the ranking, and eliminate the worst performers. Or a combination of threshold + ranking ?\r\n\r\nAnyway, if the listing policy is changed, we need to **strongly** warn the candidates to not waste their 1st trial.\r\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-427294682"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-427294682",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-427294682",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
},
{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB",
"title": "Re: [bisq-network/proposals] Filtering inactive assets (#41)",
"sections": [
{
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "**Harry MacFinned**",
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@HarryMacfinned",
"facts": [

]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"name": "Add a comment",
"@type": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [
{
"isMultiLine": true,
"@type": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment",
"isRequired": false
}
],
"actions": [
{
"name": "Comment",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 41,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Close issue",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 41\n}"
},
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-427294682"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 388417490\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}
]</script>