<p>I agree that we want to avoid confusion. My thinking is that only those that really want an asset to be visible for trading would bother with the command line flag and if they actually do enough trades the asset will become visible and shown as per normal. This way de-listing really just means hiding the asset and it will be visible again if a market that the asset appear. With a good doc on when assets are hidden or visible I don't think this would generate a lot of inquiries. Not many people would care about the hidden assets, that's the reason they're hidden. I also think it would generate less animosity to hide rather than inactivate an asset.</p>
<p>An asset removed by DAO vote should be properly removed though to make sure trading is not supported at all in the software.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-429108259">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtu1XD8Mc8hsl9jIBBbHlGsCrsJUpks5uj6r1gaJpZM4XJsfS">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZttXT9V0jVipVwyBOShUKbg7AfS9pks5uj6r1gaJpZM4XJsfS.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@sqrrm in #41: I agree that we want to avoid confusion. My thinking is that only those that really want an asset to be visible for trading would bother with the command line flag and if they actually do enough trades the asset will become visible and shown as per normal. This way de-listing really just means hiding the asset and it will be visible again if a market that the asset appear. With a good doc on when assets are hidden or visible I don't think this would generate a lot of inquiries. Not many people would care about the hidden assets, that's the reason they're hidden. I also think it would generate less animosity to hide rather than inactivate an asset.\r\n\r\nAn asset removed by DAO vote should be properly removed though to make sure trading is not supported at all in the software."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-429108259"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-429108259",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-429108259",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
},
{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB",
"title": "Re: [bisq-network/proposals] Deactivate insufficiently traded assets (#41)",
"sections": [
{
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "**sqrrm**",
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@sqrrm",
"facts": [

]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"name": "Add a comment",
"@type": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [
{
"isMultiLine": true,
"@type": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment",
"isRequired": false
}
],
"actions": [
{
"name": "Comment",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 41,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Close issue",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 41\n}"
},
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/41#issuecomment-429108259"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 388417490\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}
]</script>