<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=23560607" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sqrrm">@sqrrm</a> Yes I think technically its exactly the same as a compensation request but conceptually it is something else and for the user I think its better to distinguish both.<br>
The importance of that depends on the new dispute resolution model we have in mind. We will need a bit longer to get that well thought out and wrtten in a proposal but when we will use that new model we should have it integrated in the DAO as well and not just squeeze it in to an existing feature IMO.</p>
<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=301810" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cbeams">@cbeams</a> Yes good point. But the balance between received BTC and BTC needed for reimbursing for failed trade fees is (should be) very asymetic. And anyway as soon we get a bit more dev power we should try to fix those issues so that they become super rare.<br>
We also can use the current BTC donation fund for that. I will suggest also to add a bonded role for the one who is controlling that fund (me atm).</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/49#issuecomment-431599128">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtsnrGg72BU9QV7wZAVgamOQAmjl7ks5um1Z8gaJpZM4Xxwrc">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZtslCOfcmTYFihatq9NZ2oGwJPvNMks5um1Z8gaJpZM4Xxwrc.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@ManfredKarrer in #49: @sqrrm Yes I think technically its exactly the same as a compensation request but conceptually it is something else and for the user I think its better to distinguish both.\r\nThe importance of that depends on the new dispute resolution model we have in mind. We will need a bit longer to get that well thought out and wrtten in a proposal but when we will use that new model we should have it integrated in the DAO as well and not just squeeze it in to an existing feature IMO. \r\n\r\n@cbeams Yes good point. But the balance between received BTC and BTC needed for reimbursing for failed trade fees is (should be) very asymetic. And anyway as soon we get a bit more dev power we should try to fix those issues so that they become super rare.\r\nWe also can use the current BTC donation fund for that. I will suggest also to add a bonded role for the one who is controlling that fund (me atm). "}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/49#issuecomment-431599128"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/49#issuecomment-431599128",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/49#issuecomment-431599128",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
},
{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB",
"title": "Re: [bisq-network/proposals] Reimbursement proposal/request (#49)",
"sections": [
{
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "**Manfred Karrer**",
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@ManfredKarrer",
"facts": [

]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"name": "Add a comment",
"@type": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [
{
"isMultiLine": true,
"@type": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment",
"isRequired": false
}
],
"actions": [
{
"name": "Comment",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 49,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Close issue",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"bisq-network/proposals\",\n\"issueId\": 49\n}"
},
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/49#issuecomment-431599128"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 398920412\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}
]</script>