<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=40746153" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/initCCG">@initCCG</a> Do you have a specific suggestion on what the fee structure should be right now? I think you have some good points that the market maker should be rewarded for making the market and definitely not penalized for it.</p>
<p>The main reason for charging for distance from market originally was the risk of too many long lasting orders that would be hard on the network to maintain. Perhaps it's worth taking that risk and lowering the maker fee just to get more liquidity and incentivize a deeper order book.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/64#issuecomment-451527571">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtrBEXORpEuMXjkm_G32CPvHN7KsYks5u_51bgaJpZM4Zpo8x">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZtlujtPR-4WgSgJpe1zCDqJ5wZUFVks5u_51bgaJpZM4Zpo8x.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@sqrrm in #64: @initCCG Do you have a specific suggestion on what the fee structure should be right now? I think you have some good points that the market maker should be rewarded for making the market and definitely not penalized for it.\r\n\r\nThe main reason for charging for distance from market originally was the risk of too many long lasting orders that would be hard on the network to maintain. Perhaps it's worth taking that risk and lowering the maker fee just to get more liquidity and incentivize a deeper order book."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/64#issuecomment-451527571"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/64#issuecomment-451527571",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/64#issuecomment-451527571",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>