<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=301810" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cbeams">@cbeams</a></p>
<p>Yes the basic informational requirements stay the same.<br>
I would like even to create a onw repo, just to keep the main repo clean from too many altcoin requests. Over time we want to get our GH issue list also cleaned up and then to have 100s of tangling requests would be another pain. If they live in their custom repo they hurt less.</p>
<p>And yes they still can do it themselfes.</p>
<p>And fully agree to the docs part!</p>
<p>Any concerns if we create a own repo for that? I would call it asset-listing.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67#issuecomment-455129256">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkpZtiXMDjvG6TivYF0Kfg5cUoFHVmTFks5vEFYAgaJpZM4aBSOV">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AkpZtjKTng4z4PDj_TYwKXyUNvhqnvcwks5vEFYAgaJpZM4aBSOV.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@ManfredKarrer in #67: @cbeams \r\n\r\nYes the basic informational requirements stay the same.\r\nI would like even to create a onw repo, just to keep the main repo clean from too many altcoin requests. Over time we want to get our GH issue list also cleaned up and then to have 100s of tangling requests would be another pain. If they live in their custom repo they hurt less.\r\n\r\nAnd yes they still can do it themselfes.  \r\n\r\nAnd fully agree to the docs part!\r\n\r\nAny concerns if we create a own repo for that? I would call it asset-listing."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67#issuecomment-455129256"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67#issuecomment-455129256",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/67#issuecomment-455129256",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>