<blockquote>
<p>For more security it could be even required that the age remains frozen at 0 until X different payment confirmantions from X different old accounts have been received.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Ideally it would be good to require also that the old account has been several times a BTC buyer from at least other X different onion/accounts. Don´t know if this is possible.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think these points are key, otherwise, with the current system, a scammer could act alone in aging his own accounts and we're back to square one.</p>
<p>An extra layer of proving integrity could be doing in-person transactions: if a new trader initiates a bank wire or cash deposit in-person at a bank branch to a trader with considerable account age, that is a good sign...2-3 of those, even better.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485429328">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNWVXY2ZRYUGUYSST5LPRXB5XANCNFSM4HHM7MFQ">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNRIIIBELWERGDIO3I3PRXB5XANCNFSM4HHM7MFQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@m52go in #77: \u003e For more security it could be even required that the age remains frozen at 0 until X different payment confirmantions from X different old accounts have been received.\r\n\r\n\u003e Ideally it would be good to require also that the old account has been several times a BTC buyer from at least other X different onion/accounts. Don´t know if this is possible.\r\n\r\nI think these points are key, otherwise, with the current system, a scammer could act alone in aging his own accounts and we're back to square one.\r\n\r\nAn extra layer of proving integrity could be doing in-person transactions: if a new trader initiates a bank wire or cash deposit in-person at a bank branch to a trader with considerable account age, that is a good sign...2-3 of those, even better."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485429328"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485429328",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485429328",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>