<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=1449498" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ManfredKarrer">@ManfredKarrer</a> wrote</p>
<blockquote>
<p>One aspect to consider is to make the default pretty strict but offer features where users can "buy" reputation e.g. by locking up BSQ in a bonded reputation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't know if it is easy to implement. But it seems an interesting idea.</p>
<p>In the same vein, I think that the deposit % used by makers could be better emphasized in the offers, in order to push makers to use high deposits (see <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load issue title" data-id="435499657" data-permission-text="Issue title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2761" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2761/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2761">bisq-network/bisq#2761</a> )<br>
It could also help the transition with the possible future protocol.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485899103">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNSPGJLBOSFCJJZURZTPR5BNNANCNFSM4HHM7MFQ">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNQ7URVPFHPFOOHTRRDPR5BNNANCNFSM4HHM7MFQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@HarryMacfinned in #77: @ManfredKarrer wrote\r\n\u003e One aspect to consider is to make the default pretty strict but offer features where users can \"buy\" reputation e.g. by locking up BSQ in a bonded reputation.\r\n\r\nI don't know if it is easy to implement. But it seems an interesting idea.\r\n\r\nIn the same vein, I think that the deposit % used by makers could be better emphasized in the offers, in order to push makers to use high deposits (see https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2761 )\r\nIt could also help the transition with the possible future protocol."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485899103"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485899103",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-485899103",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>