<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=4233784" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flix1">@flix1</a></p>
<p>Proposal <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load issue title" data-id="437058941" data-permission-text="Issue title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/79" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/79/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/79">#79</a> suggests government certificates because it is the available infrastructure as of today, but the core idea is signing the bank account details, no matter id the certificate user is decentralized, private or government.</p>
<p>Your proposal above is very interesting.  I´d say that while it is true it is physically and legally decentralized, that is, censorship resistant. It would be still logically centralized (the BTC blockcahin is logically centralized).  A little privacy could be leaked (trades, etc), but I don´t see a big problem with that.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-487103638">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNTKPVBQK7PI44FPRJLPSMPDHANCNFSM4FC7BY6Q">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNXT7S26UU3N6EXRXRDPSMPDHANCNFSM4FC7BY6Q.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@mpolavieja in #23: @flix1 \r\n\r\nProposal #79 suggests government certificates because it is the available infrastructure as of today, but the core idea is signing the bank account details, no matter id the certificate user is decentralized, private or government.  \r\n\r\nYour proposal above is very interesting.  I´d say that while it is true it is physically and legally decentralized, that is, censorship resistant. It would be still logically centralized (the BTC blockcahin is logically centralized).  A little privacy could be leaked (trades, etc), but I don´t see a big problem with that.  "}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-487103638"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-487103638",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/23#issuecomment-487103638",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>