<p>Imo it was, and still is, a good reason why Bisq was started.<br>
But things have really changed, became harder, since 2014.<br>
Building bridges between fiat world and crypto world is a 100% ok mission.<br>
It's however a question of balance.<br>
Monero is really making Bisq's daily bread since months (kindly unbeknownst to us)<br>
All the brain time we use on trying to repair from our side the issues of the fiat system (and Bisq will be punished for that) would be much better used on crypto side.<br>
Bisq does what he can to compensate the technical issues from the fiat side. But it's a Sisyphe challenge probably. I even won't be surprised that after the technical issues from this side, we'll nextly get also legal issues.<br>
>From the support side, it's quite clear that, as much as the crypto side is ok and ready to scale, it seems not really the case for the fiat side.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-488343108">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNUHGPSSSPFPY53L2BLPTHEL5ANCNFSM4HHM7MFQ">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNRUXMAA3FGLOIYKCYLPTHEL5A5CNFSM4HHM7MF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODUNYMRA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/bisq-network/proposals","title":"bisq-network/proposals","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@HarryMacfinned in #77: Imo it was, and still is, a good reason why Bisq was started.\r\nBut things have really changed, became harder, since 2014.\r\nBuilding bridges between fiat world and crypto world is a 100% ok mission.\r\nIt's however a question of balance.\r\nMonero is really making Bisq's daily bread since months (kindly unbeknownst to us)\r\nAll the brain time we use on trying to repair from our side the issues of the fiat system (and Bisq will be punished for that) would be much better used on crypto side.\r\nBisq does what he can to compensate the technical issues from the fiat side. But it's a Sisyphe challenge probably. I even won't be surprised that after the technical issues from this side, we'll nextly get also legal issues.\r\nFrom the support side, it's quite clear that, as much as the crypto side is ok and ready to scale, it seems not really the case for the fiat side.\r\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-488343108"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-488343108",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-488343108",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>