<p>Ok, I see now the problem of trying to do the delay without changing the trading protocol.</p>
<p>Regarding the alternative approach, we should be aware that if a new user wants to get attested doing a buy trade he will need to find a trusted user that is selling 0.01 BTC.  Do you think there will be many authorized users that are selling such low amount?</p>
<p>This could be solved doing a higher amount sell trade, but then the new user needs to own higher amounts of BTC.</p>
<p>As general comment for both the delay approach and the alternative approach, isnĀ“t it a bit risky that a scammer tries to attest his a account with a low amount sell trade?   The victim might not notice or might not complain at all because of that incoming payment, and the scammer could get his account attested at a very low cost.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-489318259">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNV7EECZXKUCECGT6L3PTVWWBANCNFSM4HHM7MFQ">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNSFQOHKFKS7GSZGXLTPTVWWBA5CNFSM4HHM7MF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODUVGO4Y.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-489318259",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-489318259",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>