<p>Arbitration cases are meant to be rare, so I don't think that this proposal is going to cost that much. The only reason to have a lot of disputes going to arbitration is this attack, and this would bee too expensive indeed, it would suppose the end of Bisq.<br>
Timelocks could be removed or set up for them longer periods. A month to trigger arbitration would assure that only real disputes end into arbitration, and not technical problems.<br>
Arbitration now could have a higher cost for traders, considering that it's a cost for the DAO.</p>
<p>When I voted for this role, I assumed that the person in charge of the role was completely anonymous and the locked bond would protect Bisq from misbehaviour. Now I have to trust the address owner while I havent read anywhere that this person is not completely anonymous and should be trusted.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJFFTNXI7NC6GJHL6CLWJZDQSO3T5A5CNFSM4JJDKEK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDLF3SA#issuecomment-550919624">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNRD72KHRCYNRHXTD6LQSO3T5ANCNFSM4JJDKEKQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNWMDJNGKHX2PBXL2LDQSO3T5A5CNFSM4JJDKEK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDLF3SA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNXI7NC6GJHL6CLWJZDQSO3T5A5CNFSM4JJDKEK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDLF3SA#issuecomment-550919624",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNXI7NC6GJHL6CLWJZDQSO3T5A5CNFSM4JJDKEK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDLF3SA#issuecomment-550919624",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>