<blockquote>
<p>Further the initial view that Bisq v2 requires a hard fork must not be taken as “fact” but as first "educated guess". It might be that we find ways to integrate it in Bisq v1 and/or deploy it without hard fork as we found a way to deploy the new trade protocol (1.2) without a hard fork.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That legacy v2 needs a hard fork is facts until you deliver proof for the opposite. Approval of legacy v2 includes guesses about v1 in the proposal. Instead an integration proposal and/or separation proposal should be made and voted on.</p>
<p>Deploying the new trade protocol (v1.2) can't be compared because it is not an integration rather changed functionality.</p>
<p>Furthermore, now with the v2 proposals we have proposals on proposals (on proposals) which is not good for getting anything done, creating this kind of feuds.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/125?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJFFTNULWRZCAX3UO7TSJXDQTOGX7A5CNFSM4I5MQO72YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOED46C3A#issuecomment-553247084">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNVTNEUSVVV34H4TCSTQTOGX7ANCNFSM4I5MQO7Q">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNRBO72JRL6RDKCWTLDQTOGX7A5CNFSM4I5MQO72YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOED46C3A.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/125?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNULWRZCAX3UO7TSJXDQTOGX7A5CNFSM4I5MQO72YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOED46C3A#issuecomment-553247084",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/125?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNULWRZCAX3UO7TSJXDQTOGX7A5CNFSM4I5MQO72YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOED46C3A#issuecomment-553247084",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>