<p>I totally agree with the purpose of this proposal. Honestly, I would not even consider spending much time or the DAO to list more coins in the future, this is a waste of effort to me and there are other things to prioritize.</p>
<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chimp1984/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chimp1984">@chimp1984</a> who decides, and based on what, which are the valuable coins? And what are the objective reasons that imply that we should support them?</p>
<p>I think that the <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/wiz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/wiz">@wiz</a> approach is the only one we should follow in case we collectively think that the coins list should not be fixed once and for all. Quoting somehow <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/FKrauss/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/FKrauss">@FKrauss</a>, I think 10000 BSQ should be used for every new asset, independently of previous listings. 1000 BSQ is too low for me.</p>
<p>To be clear, I would only keep BTC and BSQ, but I understand that also XMR could have some useful use cases and has a lot of trading volume.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/159?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJFFTNWVRDFL4A5TMUI7EW3Q26AVBA5CNFSM4KAN3GR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHYNVGA#issuecomment-569432728">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNVWXOLCE4JMUCCCQQ3Q26AVBANCNFSM4KAN3GRQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNW7DABHPGUBM6LL4RLQ26AVBA5CNFSM4KAN3GR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHYNVGA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/159?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNWVRDFL4A5TMUI7EW3Q26AVBA5CNFSM4KAN3GR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHYNVGA#issuecomment-569432728",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/159?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNWVRDFL4A5TMUI7EW3Q26AVBA5CNFSM4KAN3GR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHYNVGA#issuecomment-569432728",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>