<p>The more I think about it, the better I like the idea of tagging the inliers and outliers as explicit subseries within burnt BSQ. That would probably require tagging them as such on burning; I haven't looked at how issued BSQ is subdivided. If we had thought of this before, the automatic computation of the inlier range would not have been necessary.</p>
<p>This is all good food for thought. I wonder how the new priority based compensations will influence work on this.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3890?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJFFTNW6J4TTPOX255AAJSTQ6IA43A5CNFSM4KFT7QP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJIW4OQ#issuecomment-575761978">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNXM7V75R4PPXV7STJTQ6IA43ANCNFSM4KFT7QPQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNW7QS7Q6RVBSMWPRJDQ6IA43A5CNFSM4KFT7QP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJIW4OQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3890?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNW6J4TTPOX255AAJSTQ6IA43A5CNFSM4KFT7QP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJIW4OQ#issuecomment-575761978",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3890?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AJFFTNW6J4TTPOX255AAJSTQ6IA43A5CNFSM4KFT7QP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJIW4OQ#issuecomment-575761978",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>