<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>can it have some positive effect if we only broadcast the offer when we see our own maker fee confirmed? And shouldn't we do that anyways?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bisq was clearly written with the intention of immediately broadcasting offers with unconfirmed funding TX, which is totally fine as long as the funding TX is <strong>actually in the mempool</strong> and wasn't rejected by the network. IMO all Bisq nodes should verify this but since they are SPV that's not easy.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4053#issuecomment-598250205">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNVFZICBMISN2MG4YMTRHD5KFANCNFSM4LGK3OOA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNUGOMSCW2UMDEUDB2LRHD5KFA5CNFSM4LGK3OOKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEOUJFXI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4053#issuecomment-598250205",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4053#issuecomment-598250205",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>