<p></p>
<p>Thanks for your PR and for using the Japan bank transfer as a template. I haven't looked at the code yet, but my initial thoughts are mostly about this claim:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Bank transfers are not reversible or chargeback-able</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Later in the PR you have:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Transfers could be made from a stolen/hacked account. The owner of the account would have to notify their bank and follow their bank's procedures for this situation. According to the code, the bank must endeavour to return your money to you as long as you notify them within 10 days.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These statements seem to completely contradict each other. In any case, citation needed for the "not reversible" claim, as it's the most important thing used to evaluate the risk of the payment method.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4078#issuecomment-601620489">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNWNH4JY2B27KC26XQLRIM54BANCNFSM4LPYNH3A">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNVXA2I5BZACXRV5FDDRIM54BA5CNFSM4LPYNH3KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEPOAACI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4078#issuecomment-601620489",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4078#issuecomment-601620489",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>