<p></p>
<p>Took me a couple of minutes to determine that the hyperlinks <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="287021900" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/1" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/support/issues/1/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/1">#1</a>, <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="288047273" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/2" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/support/issues/2/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/2">#2</a>, and <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="288333094" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/3" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/support/issues/3/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/3">#3</a> are not what you're referencing. 8-)</p>
<p>Here's information (any technical information) in a nutshell. There are 3 types of info (almost always):</p>
<ul>
<li>Concepts</li>
<li>References</li>
<li>Tasks</li>
</ul>
<p>These should not be intermingled (described further on).</p>
<p><em><strong><a href="https://bisq.wiki/Delete_and_resync_SPV_file" rel="nofollow">https://bisq.wiki/Delete_and_resync_SPV_file</a></strong></em> is a darn good write up. I'm impressed for someone who's not a professional writer (my assumption).</p>
<p>It's a Task, with the introductory paragraphs being Conceptual. That's OK. You've kept the Task and Concept separate (not intermingled). There are a number of things I would do to tighten it up both grammatically and technically, but that's what a Technical Writer/Editor does (my real job).</p>
<p>What I do is make changes, some of which are recommended, some are technical in nature and some are simply style issues. I'll do that in a separate topic.</p>
<p>The mechanics of how we do this I think we both need to decide upon. But before we go there, let's look at <em><strong><a href="https://bisq.wiki/Delete_and_resync_SPV_file" rel="nofollow">https://bisq.wiki/Delete_and_resync_SPV_file</a></strong></em>. It's a different animal. It is both Concept (the first 4 paragraphs) and Reference (most of the remainder). You're also exactly right in that it's verbose with a lot of "fluff" (perhaps unrelated info).</p>
<p><em><strong><a href="https://bisq.wiki/Trading_fees" rel="nofollow">https://bisq.wiki/Trading_fees</a></strong></em> needs some work. It's striving to be a concept, but it's got other stuff intermingled. BTW some of it I recognize as things that have made me hesitate in making a Bisq transaction. But, we'll save that for later 8-).</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/352#issuecomment-602159182">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNSC3OPJCUIC7ERH7LDRIW3U7ANCNFSM4K7ZHHBA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNWFGLPRMGN2GJMCKE3RIW3U7A5CNFSM4K7ZHHBKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEPSDQTQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/352#issuecomment-602159182",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/352#issuecomment-602159182",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>