<p></p>
<p><b>@petrhejna</b> commented on this pull request.</p>

<hr>

<p>In <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4228#discussion_r422618429">desktop/src/main/java/bisq/desktop/main/market/offerbook/OfferBookChartView.java</a>:</p>
<pre style='color:#555'>> @@ -421,9 +427,47 @@ private void updateChartData() {
 
         seriesBuy.getData().addAll(model.getBuyData());
         seriesSell.getData().addAll(model.getSellData());
+
+        // Before adding the points to the chart, set a custom node used for showing a label on hover
</pre>
<p>Instead of a comment, I would prefer the nicely named method. Comments tend to age and becoming inconsistent with the code. Best documentation is the code itself.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4228#pullrequestreview-408726908">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNWSPHGBPMTKFDCBIWDRQZZANANCNFSM4MX3Z2OQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNRLHYBEDKNSFEPJFQTRQZZANA5CNFSM4MX3Z2O2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODBOK27A.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4228#pullrequestreview-408726908",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4228#pullrequestreview-408726908",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>