<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>For "not full tables" it look in my opinion little bit akward</p>
<p>Maybe not to use stripes for empty rows?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Would potentially make sense, but it's not related to my change.</p>
<p>To achieve that, table model logic would have to be changed to remove specific CSS classes from rows if they are empty. That' most likely custom java logic that has to be done for every table.</p>
<p>This PR is only about bringing a dark-theme behavior (showing odd/even rows as having different colors) also into the light-theme.</p>
<p>So I would say, to keep PRs conceptually separated, that change should be covered in a different PR (especially since it affects both dark and light themes -- this PR only fixes some CSS tags in the light theme).</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4230#issuecomment-630099488">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNXPALUSCCPJK6QYSBDRSEGI3ANCNFSM4MYDLICA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNUNCASWA457RAL2PGDRSEGI3A5CNFSM4MYDLICKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEWHI4IA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4230#issuecomment-630099488",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4230#issuecomment-630099488",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>