<p></p>
<p>I'm probably not helping. And these are probably dumb questions. But why does there even need to be an algorithm?<br>
Value is subjective - some will see 50% as too high, some as too low, some just right... I mean arguing over 30%, 50% is all missing the point imo.</p>
<p>Choice please. Flexibility. That is the only real answer imo.</p>
<p>Why not indicate the things to consider: i.e. consequences of a low % security deposit? (Less capital tied up for maker, and taker?, more risk for taker? [thus less likely to accept?])</p>
<p>Consequences of a high % deposit? (more capital tied up, but more reassurance for taker?)</p>
<p><em>shrugs</em> those are all poorly formulated, but hopefully the gist is clear... maker sets security deposit %'s (10%-100%), and let the market decide.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4347#issuecomment-652377457">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNWWKEW3BQWFT6ELCELRZMQXNANCNFSM4OMO4PGQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNQCQIDY3TH52OCETHLRZMQXNA5CNFSM4OMO4PG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOE3RH24I.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4347#issuecomment-652377457",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4347#issuecomment-652377457",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>