<p></p>
<p>I think that this proposal adds more complexity to the dispute process, which already has three layers and is difficult to understand for new and intermediate users. Bisq was hesitant to include the trading chat because of risk for scamming and social engineering, and that's why heavy rules are introduced in the trading chat. Also, that a lot of trades that end up in arbitration are because of unresponsive traders. I don't think this would avoid that.<br>
Traders can negotiate a mediation output between themselves at the trading chat (just like they do now to cancel a trade), and then expose that output to the mediator. Maybe just including at the wiki/documentation that traders can also demand mediators a specific suggested agreement is enough.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/234#issuecomment-654104311">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNQWMRQWH44DXUGZLY3R2GGE5ANCNFSM4ORFGIOA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNXJAIDELJ3HMH427S3R2GGE5A5CNFSM4ORFGIOKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOE36NN5Y.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/234#issuecomment-654104311",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/234#issuecomment-654104311",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>