<p></p>
<p>I'm not convinced that adding too much complexity here is a good idea. Most traders will not have a good grasp of the trade protocol and it's likely to add more confusion.</p>
<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jmacxx/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jmacxx">@jmacxx</a> I think you were on the right track in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="646703260" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4340" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4340/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4340">bisq-network/bisq#4340</a> with a cancel button feature. I would frame the cancel something like:</p>
<h5>Cancel options</h5>
<ol>
<li>Cancel and recover 25% of deposit</li>
<li>Take to mediation expect to receive 10% of deposit (get less back for wasting mediator time, still need to give some back as an incentive to accept the payout)</li>
</ol>
<h5>Accept cancel request options</h5>
<ol>
<li>Accept cancel request, receive 75% of counterpartys deposit</li>
<li>Take to mediation instead of accepting cancel request, expect to get none of counterpartys deposit (for wasting mediator time)</li>
</ol>
<h4>Conflicting incentives</h4>
<p>There is a problem however that adding this kind of cancel feature makes the options pricing cheaper than the initial full deposit since using the cancel is now part of the trade protocol. Properly priced, deposits would increase.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/234#issuecomment-655372805">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNSIIFHVXZZBUKCWS6DR2QU6XANCNFSM4ORFGIOA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNWYSFY3YEJYG7AV2GLR2QU6XA5CNFSM4ORFGIOKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOE4IDEBI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/234#issuecomment-655372805",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/234#issuecomment-655372805",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>