<p></p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out! The compensation-bot is totally correct. Both proposals for the refund agent should have been reimbursement requests, but one was made as a compensation request and one was made as a reimbursement request.</p>
<p>Now that <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/203" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/203/hovercard">the reimbursement request ceiling is higher</a>, there shouldn't be a need for refund requests to be made as compensation requests.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/390#issuecomment-675073160">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNSRBTNVB5F2OEMTRMDSBGBN7ANCNFSM4QBYZCEQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNQIPPKDEG7UUZYD6MLSBGBN7A5CNFSM4QBYZCE2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFA6MZCA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/390#issuecomment-675073160",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/390#issuecomment-675073160",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>