<p></p>
<p>RSK was created less than 3 years ago. What I consider it's main real life functionality, a stablecoin, started a year ago and it's still alfa. Bitcoin didn't have many real life uses 3 years after its creation, some will say it still haven't and that it's still a mad casino. ETH itself did not make (in my opinion) anything valuable until the creation of DAI, also a few years ago. It's devs function to make some weird things that then will work into real life.<br>
AFAIK, Liquid have not developed smart contract functionalities yet.<br>
But let's focus on the possibility I pointed out that smart contracts give: performing the task of the DAO address holder (buying BSQ at a token dex like Uniswap and then automatically burn purchased BSQ). That possibility sounds great in order to remove Bisq's biggest CPOF. What are your thoughts about that?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/276#issuecomment-719824809">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNT2KTOBA4JHALRYHJTSNM3SXANCNFSM4TEEAYSA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNW7STDWN7J3A7KB44LSNM3SXA5CNFSM4TEEAYSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFLT2PKI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/276#issuecomment-719824809",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/276#issuecomment-719824809",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>