<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>In fact, using the secure two-party ECDSA signing algorithm described in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="732269007" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/275" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/275/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/275">#275</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think you wanted to reference <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="735538449" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/278" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/278/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/278">#278</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>avoid having to use an OP_RETURN output for the contract hash</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think we could drop that as well. I guess that was a bit of "overengineering" never practically used... Though it is cool to have the contract signed by both and in the blockchain...</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/279#issuecomment-723759480">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNUWW3GFKWSWQDQBQ63SO53GPANCNFSM4TNYCIWA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNSBZ2XRPWN47YDEKKLSO53GPA5CNFSM4TNYCIWKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFMR3C6A.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/279#issuecomment-723759480",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/279#issuecomment-723759480",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>