<p></p>
<p>I see that we are back to the old <strong>TTP</strong> v <strong>MAD</strong> hard choice.</p>
<p>I don't have the answer but I agree with <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chimp1984/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chimp1984">@chimp1984</a> that going back to 2-of-3 sigs with arbitrator would be a mistake. It will never scale to millions of users.</p>
<p>I also agree with <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/sqrrm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sqrrm">@sqrrm</a> that having several presigned payout transactions can be a very useful mechanism. We have not fully explored its possibilities.</p>
<p>...and I agree with <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MwithM/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MwithM">@MwithM</a> that a 2-of-2 MAD system would be the simplest, most scalable, most pure p2p and most uncensorable long term solution. Maybe it would make sense to try it with small amount trades (0.01 BTC ) to see if % of failures is reduced over time.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/220#issuecomment-726704067">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNXHN572HEGFPNLWVIDSPUHTFANCNFSM4M2RUFOQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNVJN5KXOR5ETV4MYRDSPUHTFA5CNFSM4M2RUFO2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFNIJ7QY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/220#issuecomment-726704067",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/220#issuecomment-726704067",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>