<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>I think this risk for F2F vs CBM is different for different users. Maybe a young female would feel less at risk as using CBM as a payment option than F2F.</p>
<p>I do not think F2F is inherently less risky than CBM. It just depends on ones perspectives.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think it is different from the potential resolution chances:<br>
With F2F if done right you meet at some public place where some cameras or witnesses might be of use in case you get scammed. So a pro scammer has it harder here to get 100% success.</p>
<p>With CBM a pro scammer (e.g. very high quality fake notes) will get a very high success rate and you cannot do anything to catch him and mediation/arbitration will not be of help (no way the mediator can verify that notes have been fake).</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/1101#issuecomment-728403095">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNV7WSPKJMWS6M5LXTLSQGYYZANCNFSM4EIZPVHA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNVJHPZ3MMF7LU6IK2TSQGYYZA5CNFSM4EIZPVHKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFNVIZFY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/1101#issuecomment-728403095",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/1101#issuecomment-728403095",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>