<p></p>
<p>Ah great to see work on that! I will have a look soon into it...</p>
<blockquote>
<pre><code>* TODO: Fix a consensus issue caused by failure of _RpcService.java_ to account for at least one spurious fully native Segwit BSQ tx (d1f45e55be6101b1b75e6bf9fc5e5341c6ab420647be7555863bbbddd84e92f3) which appeared in block 660384, dated 2020-12-07 (thus missing a `TxInput.pubKey` field in the DAO state). I'm not sure yet if there are any other consensus issues.
</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I assume some dev, has created that tx. With the release code base its should not be possible to create a BSQ tx with<br>
The amount got burned:<br>
<a href="https://mempool.emzy.de/de/bisq/tx/d1f45e55be6101b1b75e6bf9fc5e5341c6ab420647be7555863bbbddd84e92f3" rel="nofollow">https://mempool.emzy.de/de/bisq/tx/d1f45e55be6101b1b75e6bf9fc5e5341c6ab420647be7555863bbbddd84e92f3</a></p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5000#issuecomment-751177820">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNUYFD6S6KDESCDFQD3SWQREXANCNFSM4VIT74IQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNUZ26QLDQ4GNPPSVF3SWQREXA5CNFSM4VIT74I2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFTDBAXA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5000#issuecomment-751177820",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5000#issuecomment-751177820",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>