<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/pazza83/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/pazza83">@pazza83</a> Including this cost to general trading fees is what's been done until now, but I don't think it's fair. Not all traders use arbitration and this cost is paid by those traders who cause trades to go to arbitration</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think it is fair that arbitration is included in general fees. You never know when you will need arbitration. A user could at anytime end up in arbitration through no fault of their own.</p>
<p>Do you think any specific type of traders are more likely to end in arbitration than others? Thinking markets / payment methods as opposed to poor communicators!</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Bisq should not take any profit from bugs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-754335981">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNU7KOPDAVQYIC5XCQ3SYJXDLANCNFSM4VQQP3FA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNTW2SAAIM7PJLUXJVDSYJXDLA5CNFSM4VQQP3FKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFT3EB3I.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-754335981",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-754335981",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>