<p></p>
<p>Well yeah, when it comes to hosting roles most reports were a boring "nothing to report" since everything is operating normally... if there was a problem the person would get removed from the role by the ops team members. So for those I personally think it's fine to waive the monthly report and compensation approval process, since we constantly monitor those services already. But we should formalize it in the Bisq docs somehow.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/88#issuecomment-754502516">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNQJV5BJCKNL7PTTK7LSYLIITANCNFSM4IUV5SCQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNREC3KURGYNVQQQO73SYLIITA5CNFSM4IUV5SC2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFT4MW5A.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/88#issuecomment-754502516",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/88#issuecomment-754502516",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>