<p></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>The problem seems to be who would want to trade with a negative reputation? It would be easier to just start again. Maybe this is a good deterrent but it is to be decided?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To avoid that it requires some "scarce resource" like the bank account.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Starting again can at least signal for traders to be cautious. Possibly costs some BSQ to renew onion address? Or wipe 'trade score' negative? /weak throw out there suggestions.</p>
<p>I do think the above focus on 'payment method' as opposed to tarring the whole user is interesting.</p>
<p>Definitely agree any 'punishment' should only be on dishonest/fraudulent etc. actions. Hard to determine, yes. So maybe it's just mods/arbitrator's making that call? But consistency? Perhaps options indicating the 'type' of 'negative trade score' e.g. new.</p>
<p>Maybe its just the number of negative's... but the AGE of the account kind of gives a proper perspective... WITHOUT breaching privacy stuff e.g. +1,000 trades and thus subject to target by authorities (possibly).</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I think that is really a main problem still. Might be a UX problem in some cases, that new users dont understand that they have to be online but that is one of the bigger issues and I would suggest that justifies a negative score. Such a score is not binary anyway, so one issue will not have that much weight, we could fade it out even over time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The "portfolio" notification needs some work imo. Always on, have to go to the screen specifically with open trades... and only <em>then</em> see a notification of trader chat.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757079988">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNUQLKZJ2UPCMR2WYO3SY64UFANCNFSM4RUHGXWQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNX5JT45RAVI3CAJP33SY64UFA5CNFSM4RUHGXW2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFUQB7NA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757079988",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757079988",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>