<p></p>
<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/pazza83/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/pazza83">@pazza83</a><br>
For a attacker to know how munch trade you made he need to read the blockchain, that mean he knows who are behind the specify address.</p>
<p>Add account age with a metric that goes from +5 to +100 doesn't issue the privacy, the privacy breacher need to attach info and know who behind each bisq address. So the only method that exist at this point is to trade before hand with the address and know those infos. He has to join on one side of the trade.</p>
<p>And an very old aging address with +5 mean a lot (again if you are a taker). So people can manage risk.<br>
In a scenario when a old aging address with +100 that could indicate that this address knows how to handle thing to complete trade more effectively with minimum complications.</p>
<p>When authoritys have laptop and password there no protection against privacy.</p>
<p>Maybe i lossing a spot there how an attacker can crack p2p services if they are encrypted ?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757543182">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNRFEMIHTNYPBINCU5LSZIILLANCNFSM4RUHGXWQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNTD354HFHOXAU2NDETSZIILLA5CNFSM4RUHGXW2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFUTTCDQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757543182",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757543182",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>