<p></p>
<p>We're discussing collecting data, nothing wrong in that. No way to do analysis if you don't have data and it has to be collected or you wouldn't have it.</p>
<p>Broadcasting the zeroToSixty value to the network could work as well, but it would be more within the Bisq philosophy to make the broadcasting optional for the user. Not because the data is deanonymizing or have an impact on anyone's privacy, but because the collection of data like this has a bad reputation and it should be the user's choice.</p>
<p>It's known that the resource requirements are high to run the bisq client, it's just not easy to fix. I'm hopeful the api together with some headless client could help somewhat, but still not sure about the security issues and risk of centralization.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/320#issuecomment-794468155">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNVA2FQSQMWS3BVLOSDTC2GGFANCNFSM4YZ7TD4Q">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNQPPKPU65JLGH2JWV3TC2GGFA5CNFSM4YZ7TD42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOF5NJ6OY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/320#issuecomment-794468155",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/320#issuecomment-794468155",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>