<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Maybe a toggle to require that takers for particular offers be signed or unsigned could be added in an upcoming release, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803675113" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322/hovercard">which would absolve the need for this signing limit entirely</a>. <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/sqrrm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sqrrm">@sqrrm</a> further details such an approach <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5339#discussioncomment-511001" data-hovercard-type="discussion" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5339/hovercard?comment_id=511001">here</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I am continually for allowing choice to users (buyers/sellers), along with the proper education (UX) to assist in that decision making process. What the risk/rewards are, so no-one can claim to be uninformed. Whether that's informative "(i)" hover overs, or links to wiki pages.</p>
<p><strong>(1)</strong> So very much on board with ability for makers to toggle whether signed or unsigned can accept their trades. Trade off between more liquidity, and less essentially.</p>
<p>If there was a way for it to be like editing a trade, and it's not permanent when the trade is made - that would work better e.g. I make it so signed only (no-one takes, then I go screw it - want to allow unsigned as well).</p>
<p><strong>(2)</strong> Don't like the sound of more complexity etc. And think the longer term solution is as above, remove limits and allow traders the choice with informed info.</p>
<p><strong>(3)</strong> Short term interim, would prefer the 'compromise' 0.005 instead of what is currently intended. If any issues arise, I think hot fix should be working towards above longer term changes. Goal should always be: how do we have to never deal with this again.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803740591">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNTV5HUHMGMDWBA3RZLTE24UXANCNFSM4ZIDPHSA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNVUCWTE7JF4KOCTDVTTE24UXA5CNFSM4ZIDPHSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOF7UBXLY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803740591",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803740591",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>