<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>This topic has been <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295/hovercard">under discussion since January</a> and it's been almost a week here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, but no consensus was reached on <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="786755139" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295">#295</a> and from my perspective no consensus was reached on this thread. I was surprised when I saw it was being implemented: <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="832739547" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5318" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5318/hovercard" href="https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5318">bisq-network/bisq#5318</a></p>
<p>I was not aware the process was different for proposals. I assumed a rough consensus would still be needed.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It's a matter of network security, and given the risks at hand, I don't think any of the objections so far warrant avoiding this change in the upcoming release. Short-term fluctuations in growth and adoption won't matter if a few bad actors do chargebacks and undermine confidence for all new and prospective users.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There has to be a balance between network security and accessibility. My thoughts are a 0.0025 BTC limit for all payment methods that require signing pushes this balance too far and has a negative impact on users.</p>
<p>Maybe we should consider which payment methods are more at risk from fraud and decrease their limits rather than apply to all methods that require signing.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803663962">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNRY5ZLHNPQXFRXJIADTEZRFXANCNFSM4ZIDPHSA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNQTA6D5NH2IYNIHDTTTEZRFXA5CNFSM4ZIDPHSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOF7TPAWQ.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803663962",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803663962",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>