<p></p>
<p>I don't think limiting trade amount is the solution. After all a signed account states that the peer successfully traded ONE time (at least). To me this doesn't seem like a proper measure of a peer's reliability, a scammer could get signed before and chargeback later.</p>
<p>Limiting trades is a rather unelegant and superficial way to patch the problem. I believe in giving peers the power to choose which users to accept and which not.</p>
<p>Account age and signing status is not a bad idea, I remember entering Bisq the first time and feeling safe trading with a 200+ days-old peer, it just needs to be implemented better since <strong>Bisq needs adoption<br>
!</strong> Limiting trades amount with this kind of fees (and the other problems) will hit everybody.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803674009">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNWKYGTYWZMCOPSLEFLTEZZ3HANCNFSM4ZIDPHSA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNSRPF6UXD3WZTOO7C3TEZZ3HA5CNFSM4ZIDPHSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOF7TRPGI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803674009",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803674009",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>