<p></p>
<p>Adding Strike as a payment method does not make sense to me. To me, it only seems beneficial from a seller stand point. I will elaborate: A seller creates a sell offer and deposits collateral on Bisq, a buyer takes the offer and deposits collateral, the buyer makes a payment request to the seller and the trade is completed. However, from a buyer stand point, if someone wants to buy bitcoin, then they can deposit fiat on Strike and send BTC to themselves. Which, from a buyer POV, makes Bisq seem redundant. Why would a buyer want to use Strike as a payment method through Bisq when they can just send to themselves; especially with the collateral bit? It just doesn't make sense to me. Can someone please explain their their thinking on why adding Strike makes sense?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/220#issuecomment-844720777">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNVWQQWOG3GZAFVUIZTTOSPOXANCNFSM4WGLFRLQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNXMAERZ3VGD6UAJD4LTOSPOXA5CNFSM4WGLFRL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOGJMWVCI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/220#issuecomment-844720777",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/220#issuecomment-844720777",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>