<p></p>
<p>I think all compensation requests should use the current cycle BSQ rate to avoid any gaming of the system, especially since that's the implicit consensus and no other system has been suggested.</p>
<p>I can see the case for ops compensation always using the rate for the cycle they pertain to, but consensus for such a change should be sought first in my opinion.</p>
<p>Other exceptional cases might arise, such as deferring a CR to avoid the whole cycle failing as seen earlier this year.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/849#issuecomment-864288731">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJFFTNWDKYLUXKBYVM2TZNLTTO4XFANCNFSM44VPTWQQ">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AJFFTNUYL7ARUVUWJGM6CZLTTO4XFA5CNFSM44VPTWQ2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOGOB77WY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/849#issuecomment-864288731",
"url": "https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/849#issuecomment-864288731",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>