[bisq-network/proposals] Coinigy integration node (#18)

[Chris Beams]

@4NobleTruths, thanks for submitting this. Yes, it probably would make the most sense to do this work against the existing Markets API and to modify it however necessary, instead of standing up a new node type / dedicated API. Is that role (the Markets API + Website maintainer role) something that you are personally able to take on? We can discuss that in more detail on the role issue itself, but it would be good to know if you're able to actually take over that PHP service, and to run the headless Java-based Bisq node that backs it, to redeploy them on the hosting infrastructure of choice and to be fully responsible for them going forward.

Otherwise, just to be clear, you are proposing to do everything necessary to create pay for and maintain a Bisq-Coinigy integration, and to be compensated for those efforts in BSQ, is that correct?

I agree with Manfred it would be good to see what the base costs would be, but in general I'd like to see this too, especially if it means that we breath new maintenance life into our Markets API.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/18#issuecomment-383584241
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180423/e18f00a1/attachment-0002.html>