[bisq-network/proposals] [WIP] Compensation and valuation of translations/reviews (#37)

[Christoph Atteneder]

Based on discussions in compensation requests https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/96 and https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/95 we should decide on how we want to proceed with translation/review compensation before next voting round.

@BravoIndia, @HarryMacfinned and @ripcurlx had a call on this topic last Sunday with following outcome:

## Compensation
Translation and review contributions are up for compensation when following criteria is met:
- Language must be included in the Bisq desktop client

For languages that are not included within the client the translator/reviewer is advised to spark a discussion in the #transifex channel why this new language should be integrated (e.g. translator also acts as market maker for this market). Decision is made on a case-by-case basis. As soon as language is included within the Bisq client it is up for compensation.

If this one criteria is met all translations that are done in Transifex are up for compensation even if they have not been released yet. We plan to release once a month and all translations will be updated by the [Transifex admin](https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/20) anyways before each release.

## Valuation
As it would be quite complicated to come up with a perfect formular to calculate the compensation amount we'll do it as usual and let it evolve organically out of compensation requests. This should give new translators/reviewers an idea what to expect for compensation.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/37
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180823/941b4ff2/attachment.html>