[bisq-network/proposals] Add information about assets doing ICOs to listing requirement (#57)

[ÆJT]

Very good point, actually. One could even consider premined assets to be in question at a certain point.. considering the steps being taken by the SEC. I think for Bisq this was more of a bitcoin/wikileaks kind of moment where it was better to keep a safe distance until substantial positive impact outweighed any other possible outcomes.  Kinda like “decide you must how to serve them best. If you leave now, help them you could, but you will destroy all for which they have fought and suffered.”
My view is ico's don't usually translate into currency...which is a strength of Bisq, also my opinion. though the future could bring a great many things, most ico's are formed with the intent of a company. Which makes them securities. Its worth noting that the SEC made it a point to say Bitcoin is not a security.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/57#issuecomment-444036011
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181204/5378dc96/attachment.html>