[bisq-network/bisq] DAO: Need to be able to determine a compensation request came from the actual contributor (#2114)

[Manfred Karrer]

That is an interesting topic. I was thinking to add some additional proce (e.g. signature). But I am not sure if it is really required at least at the current state. Any contribuor should do due dilligence to report any suspicious proposal and sepcially of they detect a proposal using their own one. E.g. in the example if the DAO voting process would not detect that a scammer has abused Christophs request, neither Christoph nor the other DAO stakeholder had cared enough to avoid that. So that would signal that the DAO as a social body is in a pretty bad shape.

The fees are in place to make trolling/abusing the DAO infrastructure expensive. If we would get trolls we can increase the fee to a level where only contributors who really care will partizipate.

Or do you have any scenario in mind where this still can become problematic?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2114#issuecomment-446761888
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181212/706ef563/attachment.html>