[bisq-network/bitcoinj] jdk8 vs jdk 10 (#17)

[Oscar Guindzberg]

@ManfredKarrer bitcoinj/bitcoinj at 1700ec0 has the risk of bisq users having problems when running on windows (Risk could be partially reduced if we test on Windows).

I updated my original post to include pros and cons of every alternative.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bitcoinj/issues/17#issuecomment-448606483
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181219/48cf4d3c/attachment-0001.html>