[bisq-network/proposals] Change fee model to a more simple one? (#31)

chirhonul notifications at github.com
Sun Jul 22 12:12:05 UTC 2018


I agree that the current model is complex, and the explanation at https://bisq.network/faq/#6 is very cryptic.

Possibly a first step would be to just present the current model more clearly, starting with example fees for maker / taker on a specific trade, and only introducing the full calculation later (or in a footnote).

I think if feasible, moving to a fixed percentage or fix amount fee per trade would be ideal for the long-term, for simplicity reasons.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/31#issuecomment-406862069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180722/f50a68ab/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list