[bisq-network/compensation] For July 2018 (#95)

initCCG notifications at github.com
Sun Jul 29 11:28:36 UTC 2018


Ok, thank you.

Will do.

If you try to hire professional, or even freelance native speaker
translators, you'll find that by the word is how they charge.
The highest such rate we've been quoted by the most accomplished
professional translators has been 0.07 USD / word.

If 1 BSQ = 1 USD, then even last month's translation request in #91 was
wildly overpaid:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/91
Even at that top professional rate, the 143 word translation, for which
the contributor was paid 300 BSQ, becomes 10 BSQ.

We've so far translated and reviewed over 45,000 words, in 4 unrelated
languages, with completely different alphabets, in high-risk jurisdictions.

Plus we had people assigned to find, interview and coordinate them.

So, it doesn't seem fair that we should be paid bottom rates for trying
to quickly complete languages like Russian for example, which haven't
been completed or had even one string reviewed years since their
translation started.

We will of  course accept whatever the stakeholders consider fair.

How do we find the lowest rate per word that a translation contributor
was compensated in BSQ, and we'll recalculate using that?
Would that be acceptable?

Thank you for our attention.
i
CCG




gpg: B03B 3301 83F3 A497 F433 CCD3 4424 816B 8323 5B37

On 07/29/2018 09:34 AM, Manfred Karrer wrote:
> Hi, I just want to give a quick feedback (traveling and not enough time
> to read all).
> 
>   * The calculation with bond does not make sense. The arbitration bonds
>     are not defined either atm. So please remove that as that adds just
>     confusion.
>   * 1 BSQ is considered as 1 USD - as there is no market nobody knows
>     the real value (will likely be higher) but that is what all
>     contributors base on their contribution.
> 
> 190k USD for translations is far off. I would not accept such a request
> with my voting power. Calculation based on words and past numbers is not
> a good metric. Why not just take what you have paid to the translators
> as your base and use that? I know it is hard and probably past
> contributions have been over-paid. But when you look at other requests
> (e.g. a request for a full month dev work is about 7-14k BSQ) you will
> see that this is not in balance.
> 
>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/95#issuecomment-408664165>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Am28qaSpSZl60d6MFzOimcQcRhFrgbFOks5uLYG-gaJpZM4VlVHb>.
> 



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/95#issuecomment-408669957
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180729/7019546e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list