[bisq-network/proposals] Natural delegation on DAO voting (#34)

[Manfred Karrer]

Voting on compensation requests (or more general proposals) require time and expertise to valuate the proposal. If the voter does not has sufficient time for due diligence it leads to a better total vote result to not vote rather that to follow how others have voted or to vote based on "feeling".
Best would be if we could delegate vote to others where we know they are more expert or familiar with the request but that is not planned for the first version of the BSQ/DAO due to added complexity and effort (might be added at some later stage). But we could gain a similar effect if those who are not experts on the subject and/or do not spend sufficient time to valuate the proposal will not vote and therefore give those who vote more relative voting power.
Of course it is important to emphasize that any BSQ stakeholder can vote on whatever they like - but they should keep in mind that the goal of voting is to make the best management decision for the project (and their BSQ stake represents the share of the overall value of the project). So anyone is welcome to become expert and spend enough time to be able to meaningful valuate others proposal, though if that is not the case then it is better for the project to not vote and leave it to others who can fulfill that.
I think many proposals have usually only one or two other contributors who work with them more closely or who are closely familiar with the field the contributed worked on. 

Please give a thumb up or thumb down if you support that proposal as general guideline or not.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/34
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180730/a882dd74/attachment.html>