[bisq-network/compensation] For July 2018 (#95)

Manfred Karrer notifications at github.com
Mon Jul 30 20:09:19 UTC 2018


I agree that the price of @initCCG is very low and he deserves a higher compensation. Thanks @BravoIndia to bring that up!
I see in the feedback that the model with getting paid when software is shipped gets quite a bit of friction and I think we should reconsider that model and/or make it more flexible. I have not a very strong opinion on either side. The goal with the strict model is that Bisq is not producing stuff which never is getting used but to focus on the value for the users of anything we do. But not applying that model everywhere does not mean it ends up in that negative situation automatically. If we take care and keep an extra eye on areas which might have an exception from that rule it still might work well if that areas is productive with what is paid for in BSQ. So I think we should be pragmatic here and see what works best. 

I personally would like to delegate that to one who feels responsible to the translation area and come up with a suggestion which works for all who are currently involved. Simplicity of the model is for sure a great plus. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/95#issuecomment-408993528
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180730/e8e1d0e0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list