[bisq-network/proposals] Change fee model to a more simple one? (#31)

[Manfred Karrer]

The secondary reason for that proposal was that we will have the fee as DAO parameter which can be changed there and a % value would be easier to maintain than a fixed value as it is now (additional to the min. value). So to simplify the current model to be based on a % based fee and additional to the market distance would be still better then the current model which requires adjustments when BTC price is very volatile. As the DAO is getting closer to a complete state we should find a solution for that fee model question in the next weeks as well. I will try to dedicate a bit if time the upcoming days to make an alternative suggestions. So I think its better to keep that proposal open to not lose the discussion we had here already.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/31#issuecomment-409278211
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180731/dc29e1e8/attachment.html>